Popular Articles

Certain Research Could Remain Limited Under New Stem Cell Rules, New York Times Editorial States
The "good news" about the Obama administration"s final guidelines for federally funded embryonic stem cell research is that "government money will pay for a lot more research than was possible under the Bush administration"s cramped and ideologically driven restrictions," according to a New York Times editorial. However, "some of the most promising future research could still be denied public support," the editorial continues.Under former President George W. Bush, federal funding for embryonic stem cell research was limited "to a mere 21 lines that had been derived with private money from surplus embryos at fertility clinics before mid-2001," the editorial states. The new guidelines allow scientists "to use new stem cell lines provided they come from surplus fertility embryos that were donated under strict ethical rules," according to the editorial. It adds, "Those rules stipulate that donors must be fully informed that any embryo donated for research would be destroyed in the process and that there are other choices for disposing of surplus embryos." In addition, donors must "give written consent at the time of donation, have the right to change their minds and must not receive payment for the donation or expect medical or financial benefits later," the editorial notes.The editorial continues that NIH, "[f]earing controversy, ... decided to deny support to research using lines that might eventually be created in the laboratory by "therapeutic cloning" to match specific patients with specific diseases." It adds, "Such cells could provide a valuable way to study the early stages of a disease and to derive stem cell implants that would not be rejected by a patient"s immune system." The editorial states that NIH officials argued that scientists have yet to successfully derive human embryonic stem cells from therapeutic cloning and that "there is no strong public sentiment for moving beyond the use of surplus embryos that would otherwise be discarded." The editorial concludes, "The agency will need to reconsider those judgments as science and ethical thinking evolves. For now, the administration seems determined to follow congressional and public opinion rather than lead it" (New York Times, 7/8).
generic viagra online
The Pressure Is On For African Americans With Hypertension
Nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of African Americans with high blood pressure (also known as hypertension) say they worry more about their finances than their personal health, according to a new "My Pressure Points"(TM) national survey commissioned by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., in collaboration with the Association of Black Cardiologists.(1) In addition, almost half (48 percent) are stressed about their work and careers. Everyone juggles many external pressures in everyday life like jobs, finances and family care. But while those African Americans surveyed have increased their focus on the external pressures, have they lost sight of a critical internal pressure - one that can impact every facet of their lives? The survey was designed to test this hypothesis.
News of the day
Gene Predicts How Brain Responds To Fatigue, Human Study Shows
New imaging research in the June 24 issue of The Journal of Neuroscience helps explain why sleep deprivation affects some people more than others. After staying awake all night, those who are genetically vulnerable to sleep loss showed reduced brain activity, while those who are genetically resilient showed expanded brain activity, the study found. The findings help explain individual differences in the ability to compensate for lack of sleep.
Medical Devices

Avalere Estimates Medicare Part D 'Donut Hole' Will Be Obsolete In 2023

Today"s 65 year old Medicare Part D beneficiary will be 79 when the coverage gap, or "donut hole," is eliminated, says a new analysis of proposed legislation from the House of Representatives released today by Avalere Health. The firm also concludes that although fewer people will fall into the gap from now until 2023, by 2020 some of the sickest Medicare beneficiaries will spend upwards of $16,000 on drugs before reaching catastrophic coverage where the government covers 95% of their drug costs. Using language proposed in the recent House legislation and its own analytic models, Avalere researchers assessed what would happen to the coverage gap over time if the proposed House legislation on this aspect of Medicare Part D were enacted. Among their findings: -- The gap will be eliminated over time, but it will likely take 12 years based on the current House proposal. -- Fewer Medicare beneficiaries will fall into the gap over those 12 years, because the legislation increases the rate at which the initial benefit limit and annual out of pocket threshold grow. Those likely to benefit immediately are those who rely on multiple chronic condition medications and do not take any biologic or specialty drugs. -- The sickest beneficiaries who rely on certain categories of high-cost drug therapies currently get through the coverage gap and into catastrophic coverage after spending approximately $3,000 (based on current thresholds); under this proposal, it may take these beneficiaries thousands of dollars more annually than they are currently spending to reach catastrophic coverage support. "Achieving greater beneficiary protection is clearly a difficult challenge given the construct of the benefit, cost concerns, and the wide variety of patient needs," said Jennifer Snow, a senior manager at Avalere Health. "The proposal we evaluated charts a path toward ending the unpopular donut hole, but does impose burdens on many chronically ill beneficiaries." Avalere researchers point to other areas for future research related to coverage gap policies, including the cost of the proposal to the federal government, how it will affect beneficiary and plan behavior, and profiles of certain types of patients and how they would fare under this new proposal and the use of generic medications under Medicare Part D. Avalere Health


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):